{"id":198,"date":"2021-09-05T21:53:14","date_gmt":"2021-09-05T20:53:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reponse-ability.media-aube.fr\/les-etapes\/?p=198"},"modified":"2021-09-05T23:17:19","modified_gmt":"2021-09-05T22:17:19","slug":"the-first-accademic-step-cont","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reponse-ability.media-aube.fr\/les-etapes\/en\/the-first-accademic-step-cont\/","title":{"rendered":"The first accademic step…cont"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
\n

the master pt 2<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The text I had written during my little volunteer pilgrimage in 2007 was a kind of \u00ab\u00a0pre-phenomenological\u00a0\u00bb critical reflection that had addressed both the problematic we face and the inherent contradictions of spiritual liberation, in order to arrive at a reinterpretation of one of the cardinal models of Buddhism: the Four Noble Truths. For my Master’s thesis, I then tried to reformulate these statements in a philosophical framework.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Bojo Jinul<\/strong> (Chinul) (\u666e\u7167\u77e5\u8a25, \ubcf4\uc870\uc9c0\ub20c, 1158<\/a> \u2013 1210<\/a>) et Edmund Husserl<\/strong> (1859<\/a> \u2013 1938<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Through this work I discovered that there is already a rich philosophical tradition of phenomenology and many comparative studies that have taken various positions between phenomenology and Buddhist thought. In the dissertation I argued that there is a strong similarity between the process of phenomenological reduction, epoche, with Edumund Husserl and the praxis of Buddhist meditation. Even if phenomenological thinkers do not always see a transcendent horizon, their work can be contextualised within such a framework as the elaboration of the relative aspect experience that, at the same time, can give rise to a spiritual dimension of transcendence. For me it is with Zen Buddhism where this comparative gesture seems most fruitful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n